Ask The Editors

Q: Several times, I have removed a composite restoration because there appeared to be recurrent decay beneath the pulpal floor, only to find out that there was a just a flowable composite layer beneath the restorative composite. Are there any flowable composites that do not cause this problem?

read answer

Home > Publications > THE DENTAL ADVISOR

Not A Subscriber?

Join now and receive one year free! SUBSCRIBE

A La Carte

All users can purchase issues individually.
ADD THIS ISSUE TO CART

If you are a subscriber, please login at upper right.

December 2006 : Volume 23 No. 10

24 Years of All-ceramic Restorations

THE DENTAL ADVISOR has documented the placement and monitored nearly 5,000 all-ceramic restorations over the past 24 years. This issue of THE DENTAL ADVISOR reports on the performance of many of these restorations over time and provides the clinician with insight as to what works and why. Contributing Authors: Sara Kazan and Robert S. Wisler, C.D.T.

READ FULL ARTICLE

Product Comparison Charts:
Types of All-ceramic Restorations Evaluated (Table 1)
Resin Cements Used with All-ceramic Restorations (Table 2)
Fracture Rates of All-ceramic Restorations

Alternate Language PDFs

Spanish: Vol 23 No 10 (Spanish)

Clinical Evaluations

3M ESPE Imprint 3 Penta Putty	3M ESPE Imprint 3 Quick Step	GRADIA DIRECT (2 yr) (2-Year Clinical Performance)
GrandiO (3 yr) (3-Year Clinical Performance)	KCP Hydro Jet	KwikCall
LumaCool Whitening System	Microlux/DL	Vista-Tec

The award of Editors' Choice signifies the most unique and significant product in the issue. The editors review each product and clinical evaluation article scheduled for an issue and then select the issue's Editors' Choice.

bluephase 16i

V-Ring System